Francisco Poli wrote: >I agree on everything you said, with the following comments/questions: > >* why do you suggest repeating <program name> everywhere? Ah. The reason I did that was so that it would be suitable to print out and have the company lawyers or executives sign.
> I think it >makes adapting the notice to different pieces of software less easy (a >differently named GPL'd work can be derived from a previously existing >GPL'd work, you know): I would say > > This work is free software; [...] > This work is distributed [...] > [...] along with this work [...] That is better if the notice is actually present in and attached to the work, yes, I agree. But if you want to print out a paper copy and have someone sign it, or otherwise have a copy of the license floating around independently of the actual work, it seems wiser to specify everywhere what work the license in fact attaches to. --Nathanael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
