On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:24:50AM +0100, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
> Regarding the concept of taking the copyright of code: it's what the
> FSF have been doing since 1992 with Emacs. The difference here is
> that if you feel strongly about it, you get to keep your copyright.
The FSF asks contrib
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:12:51AM -0500, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I do not consider this to "go much further than that". The intention is
> imho the one DFSG4 tries to carter for. The author wants:
> a) derivatives being detectable as such.
> b) derivatives have to keep out of xinetd's namespace.
tom wrote:
> In UE we have a directive on database, and it says that there's not
> copyright on database but there's a new IP right called "sui generis". The
> difference is that it covers less rights than copyright (remember in the
> european version e.g. droit d'auter) and for less time.
The EU
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 19:08, MJ Ray wrote:
> Numerous people have tried many angles. More are welcome, as we
> clearly haven't found the correct approach yet.
So, I'd like to write a draft summary for the 6 Creative Commons 2.0
licenses:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
Fou
Can you guys on d-l please comment. I think CCing Dwayne would be a
suitable thing too.
Thanks
Zenaan
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:22, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the right list to ask on, but what's the
> copyright/license status of the Debian Constitution?
>
> ht
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:22, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
>>I'm not sure if this is the right list to ask on, but what's the
>>copyright/license status of the Debian Constitution?
>>
>> http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
>>
>>I'm heading up changes to the const
Here is the relevant replies on debian-user.
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 04:55, Travis Crump wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
> > Dwayne C. Litzenberger writes:
> >
> >>I'm not sure if this is the right list to ask on, but what's the
> >>copyright/license status of the Debian Constitution?
> >>
> >>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:40:08AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > a) Go try and 'reword' a book and try to pass it off as your own.
In a sense, this is what the GNU project is all about.
"Stealing from one source is plagiarism, stealing from many sources
is research."
Copyright is not
* Jacobo Tarrio:
> O Domingo, 4 de Xullo de 2004 ás 20:54:48 +0100, Andrew Suffield escribía:
>
>> They may be covered by database property laws in some jurisdictions.
>
> ... which are not "Copyright" or "Intellectual Property" laws [...]
Wrong for Germany. Our analogue of copyright law does
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:35:12AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jacobo Tarrio:
>
> > O Domingo, 4 de Xullo de 2004 ?s 20:54:48 +0100, Andrew Suffield escrib?a:
> >
> >> They may be covered by database property laws in some jurisdictions.
> >
> > ... which are not "Copyright" or "Intellectual
10 matches
Mail list logo
