On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:12:51AM -0500, Andreas Metzler wrote: > I do not consider this to "go much further than that". The intention is > imho the one DFSG4 tries to carter for. The author wants: > a) derivatives being detectable as such. > b) derivatives have to keep out of xinetd's namespace. He wants to > forbid a derivative being numbered as xinetd 2.3.15, taking away the > official version number.
If he wants that, the requirement needs to be waived if the work isn't called 'xinetd'. That'd be DFSG-free.
