Etienne Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> Mathieu Roy wrote:
> >>
> >>LOGICIEL: n.m. Ensemble de travaux de logique, d'analyse, de
> >>programmation, nécessaires au fonctionnement d'un ensemble de
> >>traitement de l'information (opposé à matériel) .
> >>
> >>(Emphasis mine).
> >>
> >>A tra
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On 2003-09-22 15:14:45 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does the DFSG definition of freedom that applies to program
> > (nobody question that) help us to draw the line at the correct place
> > also for documentation?
>
> Trivially, all Debia
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now, I think that the question is not really what the DFSG
> > allows. Because it's pretty clear that the DSFG does not allow GFDLed
> > documentation with Invariant section.
> >
> > The question is:
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> * Mathieu Roy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030922 15:09]:
> > The point is whether every software needs to be free or just program
> > and their documentation.
>
> So, you finally admited that software includes also digital photos of
> your girlfriend. Wow.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:31:14AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>
> > On 2003-09-22 15:14:45 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does the DFSG definition of freedom that applies to program
> > > (nobody question that) help us to draw the line at
Op ma 22-09-2003, om 16:58 schreef Richard Stallman:
> >I don't think that section titles are a problem--it would not be
> >hard to put them in a program.
>
> In a *binary executable* ?!?! That's what I'm talking about here.
>
> I am not sure if you are right; this might be impossibl
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Don Armstrong wrote:
> They're not Free under the 5 freedoms
Yes, that should be 4 freedoms in case anyone was wondering.
My freedoms are currently undergoing rapid inflation, which,
ostensibly, is a good thing.
Don Armstrong
--
DIE!
-- Maritza Campos http://www.crfh.n
On Monday, Sep 22, 2003, at 02:47 US/Eastern, Thomas Hood wrote:
IBM distributes the Linux driver and the binaries in a tarball that
it says is licensed under the GPL.
http://oss.software.ibm.com/acpmodem/
No source code is provided for the DSP binaries.
What about DFSG 2?
On Monday, Sep 22, 2003, at 01:15 US/Eastern, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I'd like to nail it as open as humanly possible, so I'd like to apply
to
to anyone receiving a derivative work based on the work as well, unless
there's a legal complication in that.
Well, that's not public domain any more
On 2003-09-23 07:31:14 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So any member of GNU must resign from Debian or GNU? Interesting.
I am surprised people don't accuse you of "slippery slope" as quickly
as I was accused recently.
[...] So, does the DFSG definition of freedom help us to dra
On 2003-09-23 00:45:52 +0100 Andrew Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[2] Okay, this was just an extreme example. However: since I
personally
believe that, Invariant sections or no, the term "Open Source" will
*still* be more widespread,
Do you have numbers to back the claim that it is more
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 14:13, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2003-09-23 00:45:52 +0100 Andrew Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > [2] Okay, this was just an extreme example. However: since I
> > personally
> > believe that, Invariant sections or no, the term "Open Source" will
> > *still* be more widesp
Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The point is whether every software IN DEBIAN needs to be free.
>
> That is indeed the question.
>
> I think personally that it is harmful to do so and harmless to let
> that essays where they are, since they do not interfere with the
> program and docume
On 2003-09-23 20:55:20 +0100 Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22free+software%22 - 4,840,000 hits.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22open+source%22 - 7,210,000 hits.
Distortions here include choice of language, importing of "open
source" compared to tran
14 matches
Mail list logo
