Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:33:33PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but I'm totally lost in the discussion. Do we (=Debian)
> > buy the statement from the FSF that the copyright notice at the
> > bottom of any phpnuke-generated page must not be removed and that
>
> (Meanwhile, messages regarding the perceived problems have generally
> been ignored outright. Even messages asking for clarification: "It
> looks to me like the FDL prohibits this.
>
> Depending on where and how you sent them, that might or might not
> indi
> "Henning" == Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Henning> Scripsit Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:33:50AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> > * You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or
>> intended for > * use in the de
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What about the entire set of comments on the draft version of the
> GFDL? [1] There was never a response to any of those comments.
>
> When people ask for explanation of a license, we try to answer in
> order to help them out. Criticism and demands
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:06:38PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:33:33PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > I'm sorry, but I'm totally lost in the discussion. Do we (=Debian)
> > > buy the statement from the FSF that the copyright notice at the
> From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This problem is unfortunate, but no worse in the case of two ways of
> using the GFDL than with a pair of two different free software
> licenses.
True, but this kind of problem never bites people who just use the
GPL, while it seems to be biting peo
On 31/05/03 18:48 -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > A political essay is (typically) written by certain persons to
> > persuade the public of a certain position. If it is modified, it does
> > not do its job. So it makes sense, socially, to s
7 matches
Mail list logo
