To whom it may concern:
The following URL displays the text of the Directive, available in all 11
official languages of the EU (so you'll have no problem reading it :-))
http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=en&numdoc=31996L0009&model=guichett
(All in
Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If upstream says that something is tainted, then we usually assume it
> is tainted. Here, upstream is clearly saying that the word-list is
> tainted.
No he doesn't. He says
| (Use of these files in commercial products may require written
| permission
Scripsit "Joe Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > If one took a spell-checker, such as Aspell, then:
> > - piped the whole of Usenet through it for a couple of weeks
> > - automatically removed all sequences of characters that failed
> > - removed all duplicate words from the result
> > Would the
I'm CCing RMS here because I know he's interested in hearing the
tentative decision we've come to.
The text I saw seems to say that this is one among several word lists
that Aspell comes with. My tentative decision was that we should
remove that particular word list from Aspell, and simpl
Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To whom it may concern:
>
> The following URL displays the text of the Directive, available in all 11
> official languages of the EU (so you'll have no problem reading it :-))
>
> http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnu
5 matches
Mail list logo
