If linking is "changing", that would seem to make licenses that say "you can
distribute unmodified binaries only" impossible--you'd only be able to
distribute binaries supplied by the author.
Not necessarily--these things are not as rigid as symbolic logic.
It's a matter of what intent
The first paragraph of the Vim license says that an unmodified Vim can
be distributed without restrictions. This is GPL compatible, right?
At this point, I am having trouble being sure. It depends on
questions which perhaps could be argued in different ways.
If you want to make a licens
That's a good thing. But I don't want to wait too long with the new Vim
license, hopefully Vim 6.1 will be released soon.
If you're happy with GPL version 2, then you can make the license
GPL-compatible now.
Also, some software
w
Richard Stallman wrote:
> The first paragraph of the Vim license says that an unmodified Vim can
> be distributed without restrictions. This is GPL compatible, right?
>
> At this point, I am having trouble being sure. It depends on
> questions which perhaps could be argued in different
[Please Cc: to me because I am not subscribed to the list.]
I translated Securing Debian HOWTO into Japanese.
It is licensed under the GNU FDL. The GNU FDL
specifies some conditions for modifying the work
licensed under it, including:
> Use in the Title Page
> (and on the covers, if a
On Thursday, January 3, 2002, at 10:19 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> This appears to be a misunderstanding, because GNU is an operating
> system--no more, no less.
It's also a funny animal, and some people also refer to the project that
set out to create the GNU system as "the GNU project". (Not
메일 내용이 보이지않으세요?
여기를 클릭하세요...
7 matches
Mail list logo
