Brian Ristuccia wrote:
>
> > /+++
> > / Copyright Intel Corporation, 1995, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000.
> > /
> > / These microcode updates are distributed for the sole purpose of
> > / installation in the BIOS or Operating System of computer systems
> > / which include an Intel
Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > One possible way of looking at this would be to say that allowing some
> > people to make the software proprietry is discriminating against everyone
> > who isn't allowed to make the software proprietry (thus failing point 6).
> Yeah, I can live w
Dear all,
Any (other) Danes out there who actually live in Denmark and could be
interested (and responsible) about this? It would be great if a
government finally got it right and cool if it was ours :)
Greetings,
Kristoffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian}.org>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Any (other) Danes out there who actually live in Denmark and could be
> interested (and responsible) about this? It would be great if a
> government finally got it right and cool if it was ours :)
I will contact him and hear if he got some new contacts. SSLUG alread
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > One possible way of looking at this would be to say that allowing some
> > > people to make the software proprietry is discriminating against everyone
> > > who isn't allowed to
Steelblue claims their product is open source (Open Source
Definition is based on DFSG). Below is their license from:
http://www.steelblue.com/sb/download/SteelBlue/latest/LICENSE.TXT
>From their home page: "SteelBlue is an open-source Web application
server environment in which Web-database ap
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:27:45AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Maybe they can add a restrictive clause on use (use is permitted only on
> Intel CPU and only with original microcode).
Can copyright holders control use (i.e. execution) of software?
> The question is, does the below meet the DFSG? Particularly since it
> is:
> 2. Requires you to give them the source (although it does say
> "please" at the site listed, so "requires" may be a bit harsh).
This is ok, it essentially states what the GPL implies, you have to release the
source, a
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:37:28AM -0800, Brian Frederick Kimball wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:27:45AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>
> > Maybe they can add a restrictive clause on use (use is permitted only on
> > Intel CPU and only with original microcode).
>
> Can copyright holders
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" wrote:
> > The question is, does the below meet the DFSG? Particularly since it
> > is:
> > 2. Requires you to give them the source (although it does say
> > "please" at the site listed, so "requires" may be a bit harsh).
>
> This is ok, it essentially states what the GPL
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > The question is, does the below meet the DFSG? Particularly since it
> > is:
> > 2. Requires you to give them the source (although it does say
> > "please" at the site listed, so "requires" may be a bit harsh).
>
> This is ok, it essentially s
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> The question is, does the below meet the DFSG? Particularly since it
> is:
It might. In fact, it seems a lot like the LGPL, except that it is
exceptionally vague on what restrictions it places on derivative works,
and it does not guarantee that the lic
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> > > 4. Termination clause.
> >
> > It terminates if you violate it, not just because they say so.
>
> How do they determine you violated it? Also, it requires you to
I imagine they would have to pursue legal action for this. There is
nothing in the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, William T Wilson wrote:
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:51:08 -0500 (EST)
> From: William T Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jeffry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: Steelblue license
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
>
> > >
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:50:32PM -0500, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:37:28AM -0800, Brian Frederick Kimball wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:27:45AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe they can add a restrictive clause on use (use is permitted only on
> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
