"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" wrote: > > The question is, does the below meet the DFSG? Particularly since it > > is: > > 2. Requires you to give them the source (although it does say > > "please" at the site listed, so "requires" may be a bit harsh). > > This is ok, it essentially states what the GPL implies, you > have to release the source, and thus I can take it and put it > into the upstream source, making your changes moot.
Not true. Their license says you must give _them_ a copy of your mods if you distribute your mods to a third party. This is not the same. If I make a change and give my brother a copy, I must also give them a copy. > > 3. Requires you to give them full rights to your mods (even sell > > them, from what I read). > > bsd / gpl allow this as well GPL doesn't _do_ this. This is like the QPL, right? Peter
