On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:03:03 +0200 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> With TrueCrypt 5.x comes the new License version 2.4:
OK, let's try and analyze it, then...
My usual disclaimers still apply: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP.
>
>
> TrueCrypt License Version 2.4
>
>
> I. Definitions
[...]
> 4. "You
With TrueCrypt 5.x comes the new License version 2.4:
TrueCrypt License Version 2.4
I. Definitions
1. "This Product" means the work (including, but not limited to, source
code,
graphics, texts, and accompanying files) made available under and
governed by
this version of this license ("License"
John Halton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 12:05 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If we have named Firefux the modified version of Firefox, I doubt the
> > > Mozilla foundation would have let that pass.
> >
> > There's various other reasons for that and it wouldn't have bee
On Jan 28, 2008 12:05 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If we have named Firefux the modified version of Firefox, I doubt the
> > Mozilla foundation would have let that pass.
>
> There's various other reasons for that and it wouldn't have been covered
> by a prohibition on calling it Firefo
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 16 janvier 2008 =C3=A0 14:55 +, MJ Ray a =C3=A9crit :
> > Where? The naming rights asserted above seem much broader than what a
> > trademark allows. Trademarks have many limitations.
>
> If we have named Firefux the modified version
Hi all people, I new on this list and I am
also interesting in this problem with the
license of TrueCrypt.
Maybe it can help to know that in Mandriva
distribution, somebody has packed TrueCrypt
with another name: "RealCrypt" and it has made
it available in their contrib/backports
repositories.
Le mercredi 16 janvier 2008 à 14:55 +, MJ Ray a écrit :
> > We have allowed exactly the same conditions by using software with
> > trademarked names.
>
> Where? The naming rights asserted above seem much broader than what a
> trademark allows. Trademarks have many limitations.
If we have na
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:15:49 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 22:50 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> > > a. The name of Your Product (or of Your modified version of This
> > > Product)
> > > must not contain the name TrueCrypt (for example, the following names
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 =E0 22:50 +0100, Francesco Poli a =E9crit :
> > > a. The name of Your Product (or of Your modified version of This Pr=
> oduct)
> > > must not contain the name TrueCrypt (for example, the following nam=
> es are
> > >
Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 22:50 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> > a. The name of Your Product (or of Your modified version of This
> > Product)
> > must not contain the name TrueCrypt (for example, the following names
> > are
> > not allowed: TrueCrypt, TrueCrypt+, TrueCrypt Profes
"Francesco Poli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
IV. Disclaimer of Warranties and Liabilities; Indemnification
[...]
4. You shall indemnify, defend and hold all (co)authors of This Product,
their
agents and associates, and applicable copyright/trademark owne
Ken Arromdee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, the clause doesn't keep you from performing fair use. It can't.
Aside: note that there is no global standard for what level of 'fair use' is
permitted and so it cannot be relied on.
[...]
> This should, however, make the program non-free. A p
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:27:57 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> The plain text version of the licence may be found at
> http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/License.txt
> and is pasted below in its entirety.
My comments follow.
As usual I would like to draw your attention on my disclaimers, that is
to
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> 1. You may not use, modify, reproduce, derive from, (re)distribute, or
> >> sublicense This Product, or portion(s) thereof, except as expressly
> >> provided under this License. Any attempt (even if permitted by
> >> applicable law) otherwise to use, m
On sam, 2008-01-12 at 20:27 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> The plain text version of the licence may be found at
> http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/License.txt
> and is pasted below in its entirety.
Thanks.
Summary:
* I think this software is fine for main if we package it the
iceweas
Iain Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> VI. General Terms
>>
>> 1. You may not use, modify, reproduce, derive from, (re)distribute, or
>> sublicense This Product, or portion(s) thereof, except as expressly
>> provided under this License. Any attempt (even if permitted by
>> applicable law) othe
Patrick Matthäi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Måns Rullgård schrieb:
>> Patrick Matthäi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
>>> There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
>>> TrueCrypt license, where the most
Hi,
Wow, that's a lot of license text. There are multiple bits in these
licenses that I don't like.
> TrueCrypt License Version 2.3
> [...]
> II. Terms and Conditions for Use, Reproduction, and Distribution
>
> 1. You [must] ensure that all the legal notices and
> documents (containing, e.g., t
Måns Rullgård schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello,
I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that it is not
distributeable.
But as I know True
Patrick Matthäi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
> There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
> TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that it is not
> distributeable.
>
> But as I know TrueCrypt has mo
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:33:22 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
>
> I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
> There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
> TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that it is not
> distributeable.
You're pro
Hello,
I wanted to package maybe truecrypt for Debian.
There was an older discussion on l.d.legal for an older version of the
TrueCrypt license, where the most developers said, that it is not
distributeable.
But as I know TrueCrypt has modified the license, so that more
distributions could s
22 matches
Mail list logo
