Re: non dfsg compliant build scripts

Hi Michael! You wrote: > Shipping iffe in the source tarball would not prevent any user from > deriving/modifying/patching `di' itself. As long as iffe doesn't get > installed as a package, nor is represented as being part of `di', I > don't see a problem, though. Please speak up :) If indeed `

Re: non dfsg compliant build scripts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Bas, On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:09:14PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > You wrote: > > Shipping iffe in the source tarball would not prevent any user from > > deriving/modifying/patching `di' itself. As long as iffe doesn't get > > installed as a pa