Hi Michael! You wrote:
> Shipping iffe in the source tarball would not prevent any user from > deriving/modifying/patching `di' itself. As long as iffe doesn't get > installed as a package, nor is represented as being part of `di', I > don't see a problem, though. Please speak up :) If indeed `di' build-depends on `iffe' and `iffe' is non-free, then `di' cannot go into main, regardsless of the fact that the resulting binary does not depend on `iffe'. -- Kind regards, +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | |----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
