Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's pretty clear. You may claim that the Academie Française and all
> the French people use a corrupted definition of Logiciel (it's not
> that the etymology would says). But the French language is made by the
> French and by the Academie Française.
But
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:13:31AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> I do not need dicofr to define the word Logiciel.
> But anyway, the following is the definition of the Academie Française:
> 1)*LOGICIEL n. m. XXe siècle. Dérivé de logique.
>
> INFORM. Ensemble structuré de programme
On 15 Sep 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Keith Stephen Dunwoody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? :
>
> > On 15 Sep 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> >
> > > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? :
> > >
> > > > On 2003-09-15 07:40:04 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > - But it may al
Keith Stephen Dunwoody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On 15 Sep 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>
> > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> >
> > > On 2003-09-15 07:40:04 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > - But it may also means that the only content that can be on a
> >
On 2003-09-15 09:13:31 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's pretty clear. You may claim that the Academie Française and all
> the French people use a corrupted definition of Logiciel (it's not
> that the etymology would says). [...]
It's amusing that the definition of the AF disagr
On 15 Sep 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? :
>
> > On 2003-09-15 07:40:04 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - But it may also means that the only content that can be on a
> > > Debian CD must be software under the definition that I
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On 2003-09-15 07:40:04 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - But it may also means that the only content that can be on a
> > Debian CD must be software under the definition that I
> > copied from two dictionnaries in
7 matches
Mail list logo
