Måns Rullgård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first "it" is clearly referring to the unmodified source. The
> second "it" has no other noun to refer to [...]
No noun except the altered source, the outcome of the first action?
Compare: if I say "This box: I'll wrap it and post it to you" then I
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
>> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
>> >> There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
>> >>
>> >> Permission i
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
> >> There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
> >>
> >> Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any p
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
>> There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
>>
>> Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
>> including commercial applications, and to alter
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
> There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
>
> Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
> including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it
> freely, subject to th
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:10:17 +0100 Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>
> Hi! :)
>
>>
>> I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which
>> has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like
>> someone else to
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:10:17 +0100 Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Hi all!
Hi! :)
>
> I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which
> has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like
> someone else to check over it, as I've not seen a licence exactly like
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:29:25PM +1100, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> I have started packaging petris, a command line tetris clone
> (http://home1.stofanet.dk/peter-seidler/).
>
> The README says:
>
> "LICENSE"
> You can do whatever you want with the program, it's Public Domain.
> (however, i
Scripsit Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "LICENSE"
> You can do whatever you want with the program, it's Public Domain.
> (however, it would be nice of you to credit me if you found anything
> of this useful).
> Is this DFSG compliant?
Yes. (Jurisdiction that do not acknowledge au
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2004, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB references
>> removed,
>
> Yeah, that's pretty much what it is.
>
>> but I'd just like to check with you that it is DFSG-free since it is
>> a different licence
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004, Roger Leigh wrote:
> It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB references
> removed,
Yeah, that's pretty much what it is.
> but I'd just like to check with you that it is DFSG-free since it is
> a different licence, and IANAL. In particular, the "no advertising
> wi
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:46:54PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> The following licence is in use by the libpqxx package (C++ binding
> for PostgreSQL), and a companion library (libpqxx-object) which I am
> writing. It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB
> references removed, but I'd just
12 matches
Mail list logo
