On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 06:31:47PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> See the thread "Proposal - Free the Debian Open Use logo" in the
> debian-project archives for 10/2003. I believe some trademark committee
> was mentioned as looking into the logo licenses.
I can't find much reference to the Offic
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> I don't recall a committee, and I'm not sure why there would have been one.
See the thread "Proposal - Free the Debian Open Use logo" in the
debian-project archives for 10/2003. I believe some trademark committee
was mentioned as looking into the logo l
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:08:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> For the sake of my sanity, can we not use the abbreviation "OU" when the
> two things between which it's disambiguating are "Official Use" and
> "Open Use"? :)
Oops. Any other suggestions for abbreviating "Official Use Logo"? :)
--
On 2004-05-02 05:29:01 +0100 Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I on the other hand think it is all of the above. What happened to
the
comittee that was looking into this?
If you are referring to the trademark committee (which I'm not sure
whether it directly covers this case), the
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:07:59AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 12:29:01AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
[some attribution got lost here]
> > > The Official Use logo is not under DFSG-free terms, and by my
> > > understanding, it isn't intended to be. It is not allowed in
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 12:29:01AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > The Official Use logo is not under DFSG-free terms, and by my understanding,
> > it isn't intended to be. It is not allowed in the Debian archive. I don't
> > believe this is silly, bizarre or hypocritical.
>
> I on the other h
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> The Official Use logo is not under DFSG-free terms, and by my understanding,
> it isn't intended to be. It is not allowed in the Debian archive. I don't
> believe this is silly, bizarre or hypocritical.
>
I on the other hand think it is all of the abov
Glenn Maynard said on Sat, May 01, 2004 at 12:07:42AM -0400,:
> debian-legal: Have there been any new conclusions about the
> Official Use logo that I'm forgetting, or should a bug be filed
> against desktop-base?
IIRC, discussion on this list have concluded that the official log
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 10:16:32AM +0530, Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2003/debian-project-200310/msg00020.html
>
> Ummm... by somebody called Glenn Maynard.
Right; that's the same thread I linked earlier (or the small subset of it
that was CC'd to debian-project
Mahesh T. Pai said on Sat, May 01, 2004 at 10:01:44AM +0530,:
> > debian-legal: Have there been any new conclusions about the
> > Official Use logo that I'm forgetting, or should a bug be filed
> > against desktop-base?
>
> IIRC, discussion on this list have concluded that t
10 matches
Mail list logo