Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-02 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 06:31:47PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > See the thread "Proposal - Free the Debian Open Use logo" in the > debian-project archives for 10/2003. I believe some trademark committee > was mentioned as looking into the logo licenses. I can't find much reference to the Offic

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-02 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote: > I don't recall a committee, and I'm not sure why there would have been one. See the thread "Proposal - Free the Debian Open Use logo" in the debian-project archives for 10/2003. I believe some trademark committee was mentioned as looking into the logo l

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-02 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:08:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > For the sake of my sanity, can we not use the abbreviation "OU" when the > two things between which it's disambiguating are "Official Use" and > "Open Use"? :) Oops. Any other suggestions for abbreviating "Official Use Logo"? :) --

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-02 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-05-02 05:29:01 +0100 Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I on the other hand think it is all of the above. What happened to the comittee that was looking into this? If you are referring to the trademark committee (which I'm not sure whether it directly covers this case), the

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:07:59AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 12:29:01AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: [some attribution got lost here] > > > The Official Use logo is not under DFSG-free terms, and by my > > > understanding, it isn't intended to be. It is not allowed in

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-02 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 12:29:01AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > The Official Use logo is not under DFSG-free terms, and by my understanding, > > it isn't intended to be. It is not allowed in the Debian archive. I don't > > believe this is silly, bizarre or hypocritical. > > I on the other h

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-01 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote: > The Official Use logo is not under DFSG-free terms, and by my understanding, > it isn't intended to be. It is not allowed in the Debian archive. I don't > believe this is silly, bizarre or hypocritical. > I on the other hand think it is all of the abov

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-01 Thread Mahesh T. Pai
Glenn Maynard said on Sat, May 01, 2004 at 12:07:42AM -0400,: > debian-legal: Have there been any new conclusions about the > Official Use logo that I'm forgetting, or should a bug be filed > against desktop-base? IIRC, discussion on this list have concluded that the official log

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-01 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 10:16:32AM +0530, Mahesh T. Pai wrote: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2003/debian-project-200310/msg00020.html > > Ummm... by somebody called Glenn Maynard. Right; that's the same thread I linked earlier (or the small subset of it that was CC'd to debian-project

Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base

2004-05-01 Thread Mahesh T. Pai
Mahesh T. Pai said on Sat, May 01, 2004 at 10:01:44AM +0530,: > > debian-legal: Have there been any new conclusions about the > > Official Use logo that I'm forgetting, or should a bug be filed > > against desktop-base? > > IIRC, discussion on this list have concluded that t