On Sun, 2 May 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote: > I don't recall a committee, and I'm not sure why there would have been one.
See the thread "Proposal - Free the Debian Open Use logo" in the debian-project archives for 10/2003. I believe some trademark committee was mentioned as looking into the logo licenses. > The OU logo is deliberately non-free--it would serve no purpose if it was > freely usable. > It serves no purpose now. The license is badly worded, has bizarre exceptions (You can put the official logo on a t-shirt but not in a package.) And it is the height of hypocrisy for the symbol of a free software organization to be non-free software itself. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
