On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 3:58:00 PM MST Simon Josefsson wrote:
> All,
>
> Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into 'non-free'? It is
> claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see
> https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap and https://www.tarsnap.com/ for
> background.
>
> Regarding RFP/IT
On 2025-02-05, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 06:06, Michael Lustfield wrote:
> >
> > They actually included
> > their own debian/ directory, making it a clear license violation to
> > touch anything inside.
>
> Hence Michael is right. Because even the smallest and most innoc
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:41:47PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Simon" == Simon Josefsson writes:
>
> Simon> All, Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into
> Simon> 'non-free'? It is claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see
> Simon> https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap
Michael Lustfield writes:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:29 PM Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> "Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
>> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:58:00PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> > Packaging the software for Debian amounts to modification: minimal
>> > modification but modification anywa
On 2025-02-05, Colin Percival wrote:
> And the tarsnap client is
> packaged up for lots of other operating systems (e.g. in the FreeBSD ports
> tree).
(Disclaimer: I'm a Tarsnap employee, but not a lawyer, and certainly
don't own the copyright.)
In particular, our download page[*] enthusiasticall
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:29 PM Simon Josefsson wrote:
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:58:00PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Packaging the software for Debian amounts to modification: minimal
> > modification but modification anyway. That presumably means we
> > ca
On 2/4/25 17:41, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Simon" == Simon Josefsson writes:
Simon> All, Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into
Simon> 'non-free'? It is claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see
Simon> https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap and
Simon> https://www.tarsna
> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson writes:
Simon> All, Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into
Simon> 'non-free'? It is claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see
Simon> https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap and
Simon> https://www.tarsnap.com/ for background.
I think Andre
"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:58:00PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into 'non-free'? It is
>> claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see
>> https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap and https://www.tarsnap.com/ for
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:58:00PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> All,
>
> Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into 'non-free'? It is
> claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see
> https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap and https://www.tarsnap.com/ for
> background.
>
> Regarding RFP/ITP
All,
Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into 'non-free'? It is
claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see
https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap and https://www.tarsnap.com/ for
background.
Regarding RFP/ITP status, there is now a Salsa pipeline building the
Debian package:
https://salsa
12 matches
Mail list logo
