All, Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into 'non-free'? It is claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap and https://www.tarsnap.com/ for background.
Regarding RFP/ITP status, there is now a Salsa pipeline building the Debian package: https://salsa.debian.org/jas/tarsnap/ It seems to build. If the license is deemed acceptable for inclusion into Debian 'non-free' I plan to upload it, closing this old RFP bug. I am guessing that the unusual license may have been regarded as a blocker. /Simon Copyright 2006 - 2022 Tarsnap Backup Inc. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, without modification, is permitted for the sole purpose of using the "tarsnap" backup service provided by Tarsnap Backup Inc. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
