Måns Rullgård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first "it" is clearly referring to the unmodified source. The
> second "it" has no other noun to refer to [...]
No noun except the altered source, the outcome of the first action?
Compare: if I say "This box: I'll wrap it and post it to you" then I
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
>> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
>> >> There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
>> >>
>> >> Permission i
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
> >> There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
> >>
> >> Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any p
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
>> There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
>>
>> Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
>> including commercial applications, and to alter
This one time, at band camp, Måns Rullgård said:
> There is one thing about that license that strikes me as slightly odd.
>
> Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
> including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it
> freely, subject to th
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:10:17 +0100 Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>
> Hi! :)
>
>>
>> I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which
>> has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like
>> someone else to
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:10:17 +0100 Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Hi all!
Hi! :)
>
> I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which
> has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like
> someone else to check over it, as I've not seen a licence exactly like
Hi all!
I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which
has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like
someone else to check over it, as I've not seen a licence exactly like
this one before.
Many thanks!
Julian
Licence follows:
Copyright (c) 20
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:29:25PM +1100, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> I have started packaging petris, a command line tetris clone
> (http://home1.stofanet.dk/peter-seidler/).
>
> The README says:
>
> "LICENSE"
> You can do whatever you want with the program, it's Public Domain.
> (however, i
Scripsit Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "LICENSE"
> You can do whatever you want with the program, it's Public Domain.
> (however, it would be nice of you to credit me if you found anything
> of this useful).
> Is this DFSG compliant?
Yes. (Jurisdiction that do not acknowledge au
I have started packaging petris, a command line tetris clone
(http://home1.stofanet.dk/peter-seidler/).
The README says:
"LICENSE"
You can do whatever you want with the program, it's Public Domain.
(however, it would be nice of you to credit me if you found anything
of this useful).
Is thi
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2004, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB references
>> removed,
>
> Yeah, that's pretty much what it is.
>
>> but I'd just like to check with you that it is DFSG-free since it is
>> a different licence
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004, Roger Leigh wrote:
> It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB references
> removed,
Yeah, that's pretty much what it is.
> but I'd just like to check with you that it is DFSG-free since it is
> a different licence, and IANAL. In particular, the "no advertising
> wi
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:46:54PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> The following licence is in use by the libpqxx package (C++ binding
> for PostgreSQL), and a companion library (libpqxx-object) which I am
> writing. It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB
> references removed, but I'd just
The following licence is in use by the libpqxx package (C++ binding
for PostgreSQL), and a companion library (libpqxx-object) which I am
writing. It appears to be a BSD-style licence, with all UCB
references removed, but I'd just like to check with you that it is
DFSG-free since it is a different
15 matches
Mail list logo
