;
> On last October, I e-mailed you a problem with the Intel microcode
> license.
> The problem was: the microcode (with the old license) could not be
> installed
> on some debian mirrors (mirrors with OS that don't supports Intel
> microcode
> in general).
>
&g
Hello!
On last October, I e-mailed you a problem with the Intel microcode
license.
The problem was: the microcode (with the old license) could not be
installed
on some debian mirrors (mirrors with OS that don't supports Intel
microcode
in general).
I wrote to Intel, and now with th
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:27:45AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>
> [stuff deleted]
>
> Maybe they can add a restrictive clause on use (use is permitted only on
> Intel CPU and only with original microcode).
>
It's not possible to place restrictions on the use of a lawfully aquired
copyright
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:50:32PM -0500, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:37:28AM -0800, Brian Frederick Kimball wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:27:45AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe they can add a restrictive clause on use (use is permitted only on
> >
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:37:28AM -0800, Brian Frederick Kimball wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:27:45AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>
> > Maybe they can add a restrictive clause on use (use is permitted only on
> > Intel CPU and only with original microcode).
>
> Can copyright holders
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:27:45AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Maybe they can add a restrictive clause on use (use is permitted only on
> Intel CPU and only with original microcode).
Can copyright holders control use (i.e. execution) of software?
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
>
> > /+++
> > / Copyright Intel Corporation, 1995, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000.
> > /
> > / These microcode updates are distributed for the sole purpose of
> > / installation in the BIOS or Operating System of computer systems
> > / which include an Intel
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 04:45:39AM -0800, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have packed a microcode loader for Pentium Pro, Pentium II,...
> I have some problem with the Intel license:
>
> The microcode have this copyright:
>
> /+++
> / Copyright Intel Corporation, 1995, 96, 97, 98,
Previously Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> I have packed a microcode loader for Pentium Pro, Pentium II,...
How is it different then the /dev/cpu/microcode support the
kernel already provides?
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting
Henning Makholm wrote:
>
> Scripsit Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > / installation in the BIOS or Operating System of computer systems
> > / which include an Intel P6 family microprocessor sold or distributed
> > / to or by you. You are authorized to copy and instal
Scripsit Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> / installation in the BIOS or Operating System of computer systems
> / which include an Intel P6 family microprocessor sold or distributed
> / to or by you. You are authorized to copy and install this material
> / on such sy
Hello!
I have packed a microcode loader for Pentium Pro, Pentium II,...
I have some problem with the Intel license:
The microcode have this copyright:
/+++
/ Copyright Intel Corporation, 1995, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000.
/
/ These microcode updates are distributed for the sole pur
12 matches
Mail list logo
