Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> > I have reported several defects to the FSF webmasters, but they have
> > gone silent recently. Have you heard anything about making the
> > comments system any-browser-compatible and generally accessible to
> > all?
>
> Yes
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > While discussions here on the GPLv3 are quite appropriate,
> > concerns about the actual draft should be voiced using
> > gplv3.fsf.org and the web forms contained therein.
>
> I have reported several defects to the FSF web
"John Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On controlling music, I personally see no issues with this. With out DRM,
> music or other media type content could not be legally made available over
> the Internet.
Sorry, someone has lied to you. Music and other content is regularly made
available over the
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> While discussions here on the GPLv3 are quite appropriate, concerns
> about the actual draft should be voiced using gplv3.fsf.org and the
> web forms contained therein.
I have reported several defects to the FSF webmasters, but they have
gone silent recently. Ha
I would much much rather use a Free software (ie GPL) DRM program than
a proprietary one, because as we know, content providers *are not*
going to give us open content or content without DRM. Open content is
not, in my view, an issue like Free Software is, while DRM is a
restriction that the GPL ne
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, John Watson wrote:
> I have been reading up regarding the new GPL version 3 and how it
> will restrict the usage of DRM, however during the research I do get
> conflicting stories regarding the objectives of this license.
>
> One aim is to prevent companies such as Sony to use
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:15:40PM +, John Watson wrote:
>> On controlling music, I personally see no issues with this. With
>> out DRM, music or other media type content could not be legally
>> made available over the Internet.
>
> This is false.
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:15:40PM +, John Watson wrote:
> On controlling music, I personally see no issues with this. With out DRM,
> music or other media type content could not be legally made available over
> the Internet.
This is false. Without DRM, certain greedy and immoral content pr
Hi fowks.
I have been reading up regarding the new GPL version 3 and how it will restrict the usage of DRM, however during the research I do get conflicting stories regarding the objectives of this license.
One aim is to prevent companies such as Sony to use DRM type technology, to sell its
9 matches
Mail list logo
