Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > While discussions here on the GPLv3 are quite appropriate, concerns > about the actual draft should be voiced using gplv3.fsf.org and the > web forms contained therein.
I have reported several defects to the FSF webmasters, but they have gone silent recently. Have you heard anything about making the comments system any-browser-compatible and generally accessible to all? As I understand it, the system is RT-based, so there should a general-purpose email interface lurking which might be usable, rather than the reject all one. > Otherwise the committees will have a hard time acting upon any of the > issues that you have raised. With the continuing inaccessible processes and the closure of accessible forums like [EMAIL PROTECTED], it should be no surprise that this discussion is somewhat hard to follow. This is becoming a case study in how not to run a consultation that matches the stuff the UK Patent Office has done, in my opinion. When will the remaining committees become public? -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
