On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 2:53 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On December 7, 2018 6:34:39 PM UTC, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> >It was a long ongoing process.
> >The news is that it seems to have finally come to an end...
This appears to be the commit where it happened:
https://github.com/open
On December 7, 2018 6:34:39 PM UTC, Francesco Poli
wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 17:04:22 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
>This has already been mentioned in the past:
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/09/msg1.html
>
>It was a long ongoing process.
>The news is that it seems to have finally c
On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 17:04:22 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
[...]
> > So this is true for series 1.1.1 and earlier. The master branch will be
> > released as 3.0 and some point. So we have some time to clarify this
> > :)
>
> Ah, so this is not a change that has happ
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
> On December 7, 2018 6:04:22 AM UTC, Ben Finney wrote:
> >Is the grant of license somewhere in the Git repository to be examined?
>
> So the readme file
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/README
>
> has this:
>
> The OpenSSL toolkit is licensed
On December 7, 2018 6:04:22 AM UTC, Ben Finney wrote:
>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
>> The wording (of the addon) was drafted on debian-legal a few years
>> back.
>
>Can you give citations to what you're referring to? there have been
>many
>such discussions so it would help if we're both tal
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
> Yes and my understanding is that every GPLv2 software, that links
> against openssl, needs such an addon.
The alternative being that the resulting work is not legally
redistributable (because the terms of both GPLv2 and the OpenSSL license
cannot be simultaneo
Ben Finney writes:
>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[hidden email]> writes:
>
>> Clamav for instance has this piece:
>
>Right. That piece is not part of any version of the GPL; it is an
>additional clause in the grant for recipients of that specific work
>(ClamAV).
Yes and my understanding is th
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
> GPL software has an exception clause in order to link against OpenSSL
> which has the advertising clause.
This appears to be a statement that any work licensed under GNU GPL has
such an exception. That is not true, to my knowledge.
> Clamav for instance has t
Hi,
GPL software has an exception clause in order to link against OpenSSL
which has the advertising clause. Clamav for instance has this piece:
| In addition, as a special exception, the copyright holders give
| permission to link the code of portions of this program with the
| OpenSSL library un
9 matches
Mail list logo
