Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebast...@breakpoint.cc> writes: > On December 7, 2018 6:04:22 AM UTC, Ben Finney <bign...@debian.org> wrote: > >Is the grant of license somewhere in the Git repository to be examined? > > So the readme file > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/README > > has this: > > The OpenSSL toolkit is licensed under the Apache License 2.0, which > means that you are free to get and use it for commercial and > non-commercial purposes as long as you fulfill its conditions. > > Is this enough or should upstream add more to this?
That looks clear enough: it names the specific work (“the OpenSSL toolkit”), and grants license with the complete set of license conditions (“the Apache License 2.0”, which specific text is also included in the work). I think that constitutes a clear grant of license in the work. -- \ “Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.” (“Whatever is | `\ said in Latin, sounds profound.”) —anonymous | _o__) | Ben Finney
