On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:47, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I was wondering whether it would be legal for me compile and
> link Balsa (GPL) to the libesmtp5 (LGPL) [1] and libldap2 (OpenLDAP PL
> [2]) libs. Doing so results in a binary that is indirectly linked to
> OpenSSL for which Balsa
Could someone please answer my legal query, or provide me with some
persuasive arguments for including an OpenSSL exclusion clause in
addition to the GPL that I can send to Balsa upstream. I can't really
work on fixing this neglected package until someone tells me what I
can and can't do with Balsa
Hi everyone,
I was wondering whether it would be legal for me compile and
link Balsa (GPL) to the libesmtp5 (LGPL) [1] and libldap2 (OpenLDAP PL
[2]) libs. Doing so results in a binary that is indirectly linked to
OpenSSL for which Balsa does not have a exclusion clause for at this
current
3 matches
Mail list logo
