Hi everyone,
I was wondering whether it would be legal for me compile and
link Balsa (GPL) to the libesmtp5 (LGPL) [1] and libldap2 (OpenLDAP PL
[2]) libs. Doing so results in a binary that is indirectly linked to
OpenSSL for which Balsa does not have a exclusion clause for at this
current time. I don't know whether this indirect linking will produce
a contaminated package that is unacceptable for main.Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau [1] http://www.stafford.uklinux.net/libesmtp/ [2] http://www.openldap.org/software/release/license.html -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau Computer Science & Student Rep, UNSW * * # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer * * <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0> <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0> * * GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1 9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpcmDFDVbSah.pgp
Description: PGP signature
