Hi,
IMO, non-free:
- fail with desert island/dissident tests
- non-commercial constraints
My 2 cents
On 10/11/24 11:33, PEPPÈ Santarsiero wrote:
This version include correction reported by Soren Stoutner from the
debian team.
Thanks for considering my request.
---
uture problems that may happen to whoever uses the code.
License Website:
https://www.vtiger.com/open-source-crm/vtiger-public-license/
Regards,
--
Guilherme Xavier
1808 D926 7486 3C2E 07B7 B08C 1B14 0644 976B 8AC9
being able to choose your master. Freedom means not having a |
>> _o__)master.” —Richard M. Stallman, 2007-05-16 |
>
> To have the choice between "blessed free software licenses" is
> being able to choose your master... and your users' master.
>
> I have no master.
This is your choice and you are in your right.
Thanks for contributing to free software.
Cheers,
Xavier
Le 04/12/2018 à 11:17, Giacomo Tesio a écrit :
> Hi Xavier actually, before writing to the debian-legal list, I
> compared the license against the three tests
> (I've found the "The tentacle of evil test" on the Wikipedia page
> about DFSG,
>
Le 04/12/2018 à 10:07, Giacomo Tesio a écrit :
> Il December 4, 2018 6:04:59 AM UTC, Ben Finney ha
> scritto:
>> If you want to release a work of software compatible with Debian, please
>> do everyone – yourself included – a huge favour and choose an existing,
>> well-understood, known-by-copyrig
Le 16/10/2018 à 22:44, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> * Xavier:
>
>>> From: Eliot Horowitz
>>> Date: Tue Oct 16 13:03:02 UTC 2018
>>> Subject: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License,
>>> Version 1 (SSPL v1)
>>> ...
>>>
Le 16/10/2018 à 22:44, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> * Xavier:
>
>>> From: Eliot Horowitz
>>> Date: Tue Oct 16 13:03:02 UTC 2018
>>> Subject: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License,
>>> Version 1 (SSPL v1)
>>> ...
>>>
Le 16/10/2018 à 16:03, Paul Wise a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed MongoDB are pushing a new license that tries to be like the
> AGPL but more expansive in what software it covers and more expansive
> in what activities trigger the clauses within it.
>
> They have posted to the OSI license review
Le 03/08/2018 à 11:44, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> I would like to package X13-ARIMA-SEATS¹, which is software developed
> at the U.S. Department of Commerce. As such, it is not copyrighted in
> the U.S., and rights to use, redistribute and modify are explicitly
> gr
ation."
Can it be recognize by DFSG ?
Regards,
Xavier
.
In the US MUSIC123 and MUSIC123.COM are registered.
I'm not a lawyer but it seems that our music123 doesn't enter in the
Goods and Services description [1]. Is this enough ?
I CC the debian-legal list for help/advices.
xavier
[1] http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4002
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ludovic Brenta a écrit :
> Selon xavier grave :
>> Can't we just use the testsuite apart from package
>> building to be sure that our packaging is OK and then distribute a
>> version without the .idl files ? Testing shou
t they redistribute the OMG's .idl files (and they even pointed me to
> the OMG license). I think such redistribution is illegal.
>
> Any other opinion?
>
Hi,
I'm sorry I can't help on such problems. It is very far from my
understanding. Can't we just use the
Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 Ã 10:32 +0200, Olivier Galibert a Ãcrit :
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:17:15AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 Ã 10:04 +0200, David Schmitt a Ãcrit :
> >
> > > Then I would like to exercise my right under the GPL to aquir
Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 Ã 10:04 +0200, David Schmitt a Ãcrit :
> Then I would like to exercise my right under the GPL to aquire the source
> code
> for the firmware (and the required compilers, starting with genfw.c which is
> mentioned in acenic_firmware.h) since - as far as I know - firmware i
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Has anyone asked Linus what his feelings are regarding firmware?
Good idea. And two interesting posts related tot his issue:
(Wed, 10 Dec 2003 )
http://groups.google.fr/groups?selm=11gWH-4XN-1%40gated-at.bofh.it&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
"And I think thi
One positive point: this license is stup^Wrestrictive enough to be
eligible as "bad license example" in Debian :)
Thanks for the comments.
Xavier
e/main/source/
(libhttrack-swf is an external module to httrack, also in
http://debian.httrack.com/dists/unstable/main/source/)
Regards,
---
Xavier Roche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
18 matches
Mail list logo
