Re: Winetricks may be inciting copyright infringement

2014-08-12 Thread Ricardo Mones
because they don't warn that some content could be illegal to download? regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot today. /usr/games/fortune signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Perforce distribution license

2014-05-09 Thread Ricardo Mones
sking out of > curiosity.) A deal with the Devil is better, he only requests your first born child. regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Datei nicht gefunden Fehler 404 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Compliance with DFSG

2014-03-07 Thread Ricardo Mones
” or “copr.” for “copyright”; and “the Authors” is not > a useful descriptor for a copyright holder. Isn't the word "Copyright" already enough, and therefore the '(c)' just redundant but not relevant for the case ? regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.Unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Font averia

2013-03-18 Thread Ricardo Mones
the fonts used were all under SIL OFL. Being that I don't see the problem. Do you have any hint that this confirmation could be flawed? regards, [0] http://bugs.debian.org/703305 -- Ricardo Mones ~ Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-27 Thread Ricardo Mones
>Note that anyone unhappy with the terms of the WTFPL because of the > complex wording or for any other reason can relicence the software under > almost any licence of their choice without having to ask for permission. I'm not unhappy with it, I'm unhappy with

Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Ricardo Mones
to precisely remove Sam's name and put the name of who is licensing: "and changing it is allowed as long as the name is changed." License, as I read it, has no copyright for itself, which sounds pretty logical given its spirit :) regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://peopl

Re: recommendation for packaging license

2011-09-02 Thread Ricardo Mones
time and propagate errors when that happen, not a good idea. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been. -- Mark Twain» signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: default CC license version number is always latest?

2011-01-19 Thread Ricardo Mones
to something DFSG-compatible ;-) Unfortunately this makes things even worse and therefore such theme shall not enter main. thanks all for your answers, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Another good night not to sleep in a eucalyptus tree.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature

default CC license version number is always latest?

2011-01-18 Thread Ricardo Mones
my feelings are right). regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «You will be advanced socially, without any special effort on your part.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: uploading GPLv3 packages

2007-08-01 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:52:22 -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:07:17AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > > Whether a GPLv3 work is distributable compliant with Debian's own DFSG > > > is a different matter -- and if the a

Re: uploading GPLv3 packages

2007-07-30 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:42:03 +1000 Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is it legal to upload a package with GPLv3 license right now? > > It's always legal to upload it anywhere, because the license gi

uploading GPLv3 packages

2007-07-30 Thread Ricardo Mones
Hi, Just a simple question which the previous threads about GPLv3 didn't solve for me or I was unable to see the answer, anyway: Is it legal to upload a package with GPLv3 license right now? thanks in advance, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Good day to deal