On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 05:39:06PM +, Ron wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > OTOH this debian/copyright is clearly deficient in many ways, but stop
> > accusing him of bad faith, you're just out of your mind.
>
> Thanks Pi
tream. If you
believe you read something like that, read again. And again, because
you're wrong.
OTOH this debian/copyright is clearly deficient in many ways, but stop
accusing him of bad faith, you're just out of your mind.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpCecG2Urkbw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, at least, it's Debian's
position for now.
There is no troll, only misunderstanding from your end :)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpDiySwjKqNu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ake. He
> suggested following terms (which btw were used in another package
> shipped in debian):
You could have googled a bit: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
a harmless header that can help a lot of
MUAs. or please strip your signature, it costs many more octets than a
M-F-T.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp8w2CBySBxv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Le Lun 22 Mai 2006 01:46, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:06:42AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I personally thinks it hurts our users, and as a secondary effect,
> > us. Beeing distributable is a property that should not be depends
> > upon the ti
r 1 or rather 0.
for me, this issue *is* the real one. and I'd support any GR (or any
kind of action) that would precise what we call "distributable" implies
durability of that state. I just cannot imagine that we allow a package
even into non-free if we are not sure it can stay he
Le Dim 21 Mai 2006 23:04, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> Fears are unfounded, we can at any time terminate the license by
> removing java!
just do it, shall we ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTE
Le Mer 12 Avril 2006 22:13, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:00:51 +0200 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I've read the thread about PHP license 3.01 in february, and had
> > the impression that the consensus was that that license is
> > acceptable for thi
Please Cc: me on debian-legal, I'm not subscribed.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpx6XXqSSMTM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
cision. Waiting for it now ...
>
> Greetings and thanks for info
> Steffen
the project decision is clear IMHO : read the php license, you'll see it
can only apply to the main and official PHP distribution.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EM
ectively. And I'm not comfortable with (6) because
it misses the fact that clause 6 is *only* dedicated to the
redistribution of PHP under any form (and not to the current package).
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
spy/copyright
kuiviewer/copyright
libcvsservice0/copyright
libqt3c102-mt/copyright
libqt3-headers/copyright
libqt3-mt-dev/copyright
ocaml/copyright
poxml/copyright
qt3-designer/copyright
qt3-dev-tools/copyright
qt3-doc/copyright
umbrel
13 matches
Mail list logo
