On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Christian BAYLE wrote: > As far as I know QPL is considered an non DFSG compatible > > "Restrictions, such as giving the author your changes if they ask, are > not DFSG-free." > > found on debian-legal > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/04/msg00259.html > > Though this is considered as a free license by FSF not GPL Compatible > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.fr.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses > > I CC this to debian-legal, (please CC me, directly) to know if I can put > this QPL licensed code knowing this is php script > http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/index.php > http://www.trolltech.com/licenses/qpl.html > > > Christian
Well, I'm not from debian-legal, but please have a look on ocaml, it's a QPL software, and is in the main archive ! and well, it's not the only one : grep -rl "THE Q PUBLIC LICENSE" */copyright cervisia/copyright kapptemplate/copyright kbabel/copyright kbugbuster/copyright kcachegrind/copyright kdesdk/copyright kdesdk-kfile-plugins/copyright kdesdk-misc/copyright kdesdk-scripts/copyright kompare/copyright kspy/copyright kuiviewer/copyright libcvsservice0/copyright libqt3c102-mt/copyright libqt3-headers/copyright libqt3-mt-dev/copyright ocaml/copyright poxml/copyright qt3-designer/copyright qt3-dev-tools/copyright qt3-doc/copyright umbrello/copyright -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- gpg : 1024D/A1EE761C 6045 409E 5CB5 2CEA 3E70 F17E C41E 995C C98C 90BE spam: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
