Le mer. 12 févr. 2025 à 22:43, Soren Stoutner a écrit :
> On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 1:31:58 PM MST Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
> > Is this DFSG-free ?
>
> >
>
> > * Largely written by Julian Elischer (jul...@tfs.com)
>
> > * for TRW Financial Systems.
>
Is this DFSG-free ?
* Largely written by Julian Elischer (jul...@tfs.com)
* for TRW Financial Systems.
*
* TRW Financial Systems, in accordance with their agreement with Carnegie
* Mellon University, makes this software available to CMU to distribute
* or use in any manner that they see fit
Le sam. 22 janv. 2022 à 21:04, Yadd a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Some logos have now GihHub style license. There is at least one non-DFSG
> constraint, but is there some exceptions for logo (ie trademark)?
>
> Example :
>
> How to Use These Logos
> Do these awesome things
> ✅ Use the WebAuthn logo to link
2018-04-28 13:36 GMT+02:00 Jérémy Lal :
> In zlib documentation i found this license in these two files:
> doc/rfc1951.txt
> doc/rfc1952.txt
> Copyright: 1996, L.Peter Deutsch
> Permission is granted to copy and distribute this document for any
> purpose and without
In zlib documentation i found this license in these two files:
doc/rfc1951.txt
doc/rfc1952.txt
Copyright: 1996, L.Peter Deutsch
Permission is granted to copy and distribute this document for any
purpose and without charge, including translations into other
languages and incorporation into compil
Hi Xavier,
I don't think there is such a thing named "recognized by DFSG".
A license can pass DFSG or not, and this one, after reading it,
seems to be okay.
Hopefully more experimented eyes will read it too.
IANAL,
Jérémy (x97).
2017-11-21 18:35 GMT+01:00 Xavier :
> Hi all,
>
> French govern
http://polymer.github.io/PATENTS.txt
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/facebook/react/master/PATENTS
(They are similar)
It's unclear to me if they render their otherwise osi-approved license
DFSG-free or not. Thank you for any light on this.
Jérémy
On 06/06/2013 07:40, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on packaging ccnet[1] library (requirement for seafile),
> and the upstream code has two licenses in the base directory - MIT
> and GPL-3+.
>
> When I asked for clarification they have replied the code is GPL-3+
> with some parts reus
On 01/02/2013 01:25, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Feb 2013, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> My issue is that i don't understand how public domain is DFSG,
>
> If a work can actually be placed into the public domain
Does this mean there are cases where the work cannot actually
be pl
On 31/01/2013 23:16, Ben Finney wrote:
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>
>> Will you still be uploading to main, if one day it becomes illegal
>> in your own country ?
>
> Are you taking a poll? Or is there particular interest in MJ Ray's
> answer?
No.
> What is the
On 31/01/2013 19:45, MJ Ray wrote:
> Jérémy.
>> Public domain is not a license, its meaning depends
>> on the country you're in. What if that country applies
>> laws that violate DFSG ?
>>
>> Please enlighten me.
>
> Why? Does this affect any software that you're packaging?
Not particularly. Som
http://opensource.org/faq#public-domain
http://opensource.org/faq#cc0
Public domain is not a license, its meaning depends
on the country you're in. What if that country applies
laws that violate DFSG ?
Please enlighten me.
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.
On 03/12/2012 10:38, Florian Rothmaier wrote:
> Hi Jérémy,
>
>
> Am 01.12.2012 12:28, schrieb Jérémy Lal:
>
>> I thought "public-domain" wasn't DFSG (because it's not in some countries).
>
> That's interesting and something new to me
On 01/12/2012 12:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 10:47:47 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>> Le Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:26:29PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
>>>
>>> P.P.S.: I am not sure what you should write in the Copyright field for
>>> the upstream files, but "(c) 1996-2012 by
https://github.com/isaacs/inherits/commit/112807f2
Author switched to WTFPL2, solving the problem.
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f6bb39f.
On 17/03/2012 11:14, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
> wrote:
>> Jérémy Lal writes:
>>> If i can tell the author "here's a known license that fits your needs",
>>> i can consider i answered him.
&g
On 17/03/2012 16:14, Felyza Wishbringer wrote:
> If, on contact, his goal is just wide-openness delivered in an
> eccentric license, then I would recommend the WTFPL v2 located at
> http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/ which basically says you can do anything you
> want to with the software. Its an eccentric
On 17/03/2012 01:18, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>> could anyone help me resolve this license question :
>> https://github.com/isaacs/inherits/commit/0b5b6e9964ca
>
> That page contains more than one question.
If i can tell the author "here's
Hi,
could anyone help me resolve this license question :
https://github.com/isaacs/inherits/commit/0b5b6e9964ca
i'm not smart enough to grasp what the author wants in that case.
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 10/03/2012 01:23, Ben Finney wrote:
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>
>> On 09/03/2012 23:14, Ben Finney wrote:
>>>> On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
>
>>>>> In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of
>>>>> Debi
On 09/03/2012 23:14, Ben Finney wrote:
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>
>> On 06/03/2012 19:20, Isaac Schlueter wrote:
>>> In other words, if the terms of this license keep npm out of Debian
>>> Stable, or any particular distro, then that means it's working. The
>&g
On 24/01/2012 15:24, MJ Ray wrote:
> Jérémy Lal
>> following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
>> is it still DFSG ?
>
> If it just this one addition:
>> Distributions of all or part of the Software intended to be used
>> by the recipients as they
On 24/01/2012 01:51, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>> following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
>
> License proliferation is bad, please help get rid of it by asking
> upstream to switch to a standard license.
I will, an
Hi,
following npm license is Expat + one restriction,
is it still DFSG ?
Regards,
Jérémy.
MIT +no-false-attribs License
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software with
by the official Joyent
Node.js open source or commercial project."
Is that right ? are there more changes to do to stay DFSG ?
Regards,
Jérémy Lal
[0]
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nodejs.html
[1]
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libnode&searchon=names&sui
25 matches
Mail list logo
