On 17/03/2012 16:14, Felyza Wishbringer wrote: > If, on contact, his goal is just wide-openness delivered in an > eccentric license, then I would recommend the WTFPL v2 located at > http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/ which basically says you can do anything you > want to with the software. Its an eccentric license that is Debian > compliant, and wide open.
I came to the same conclusion. > Otherwise, I'd probably point them in the > direction of the BSD or zlib licenses, which are wide open as well, > but more well known. > > If he doesn't want to part with his license, you could also try to ask > for him to dual license as a last resort. His license along side a > DFSG license, such that person receiving the software can choose > either... that may work. > If they don't wish to relicense or dual license with a Debian friendly > alternative, then yes, reimplementation under a better license. I was just doing that. Jérémy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f64ad40.40...@melix.org
