Re: Bug#365408: [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk

2006-05-22 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
used to call a runtime, compiler, etc of the Java(tm) language! Java? is a trademark of Sun Microsystems. - -- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg Formateur Cellule Programmation. Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Commen

Re: Bug#365408: [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk

2006-05-18 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cc'ing to debian-legal: summary: The major question is about replacing java1-runtime, java1-compiler, java2-runtime and java2-compiler virtual packages by classpath-jre, classpath-jdk for free java implementation and java-jre and java-jdk for non-free

Re: RFS: tvbrowser -- TV-Browser is a java-based TV guide

2005-08-07 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Bas Wijnen wrote: [...] > I very much value (in GNU's words) "The freedom to study how the program > works, and adapt it to your needs". Therefore none of my sources.lists have > contrib in them. I don't want to use a program, just to find that I cannot > reasonably modify it when I feel the need

Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-18 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 21:29, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> I did Cc: debian-legal to have a look at the license but I think it's >> completly non-free! > > Not only non-free, but so bad we couldn't even p

Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all, I'm facing a serious problem with the ArgoUML debian package. The next generation of ArgoUML (current development 0.15 and next stable 0.16) will use the mdr library: http://mdr.netbeans.org/download/daily.html Which is an implementation of the JMI from Sun. As you can see in the web pag

Re: Jimi (Java lib) as a Debian package, is it legal?

2003-11-16 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
] > unmodified -> DFSG 3 [...] > DFSG 3, DFSG 6, etc. [...] > Debian certainly won't commit to this. [...] > DFSG 3. [...] > DFSG 3, among others. [...] > Ah, so it has GIF problems, too, and we're responsible for them > Nice... Well, for the gif problem... I s

Re: Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
I'm sorry if it came across that way. It was mostly meant as context > (especially for folks who've never seen the requirements list for > nuclear-safe stuff). Though I think removing the word 'licensed' there > would probably make it pass, since it doesn't exp

Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-27 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hello everybody, I am the new maintainer of argouml and I saw the attached message on the dev-mailing-list. They added new sources but with a Sun's License. I think it would be ok to include in Debian but I prefer to ask here (I think it's the best place, isn't it? ;-)). Many thanks for your time

Re: Bug#188158: ITP: libjta-java -- JTA is the JavaTM Transaction API from SunTM

2003-04-09 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Done, thanks :-) ___ / Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 11:57, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: | > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 11:36:30AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: | > > Description

Re: Bug#188158: ITP: libjta-java -- JTA is the JavaTM Transaction API from SunTM

2003-04-09 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
ndant (and not so self | explanatory). done. | I'm not sure you need to place `TM' after Java or Sun, so i'm Cc-ing | -legal. removed, I saw the response of -legal Many thanks for your help, -- Arnaud Vandyck @ work FingerPrint =