I managed to explain why in this interesting example the
invariant sections do not deprive our rights to read, to adapt, to
distribute and to improve.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the purpose of obstructing the user's ability to
read the document. In our case there is no intention.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
scussion that's been done for years
> now. It isn't getting us anywhere.
I find our discussion very interesting and usefull. I agreed with
some of your arguments and it seams to me that you agreed with some of
my arguments. Moreover, I think I can create something like a FAQ
ab
On 13.VI.2003 at 13:06 Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:29:03PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > I'd like to mention here that FSF talks about free software and free
> > documentation and not about free works.
>
> Well, they're the Free *Sof
e a third movement in our community (as OSI
already did). Some people in FSF are too sensitive about
definitions.
Anton Zinoviev
odified
fonts also or it is valid only for the original unmodified fonts.
Anton Zinoviev
eoretical concern.
Anton Zinoviev
5. We do not use registered trademarks in font names.
I don't know what is the right legal choice, but as developer I would
suggest not to choose 4, because the font names are the interface to
fonts and we will come to something similar to the problems with the
LaTeX license.
Anton Zinoviev
fonts) would
> be silly IMHO.
No. The kernel was not good example, but I think it is clean that we
don't want to be forced to use unmodified programs because of the
trademarks.
Anton Zinoviev, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rams stop to work because my kernel is not
> > named `Linux' that is not OK.
>
> I think it's a bit too paranoid approach, maybe it is this evening that
> I just cannot grok, what you exactly mean. May I forward this
> discussion to Adam Twardoch, who is more competent in font issues?
Certainly.
Anton Zinoviev, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15.V.2001 at 15:08 Miros/law Baran wrote:
> 15.05.2001 pisze Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > BTW, Helvetica is registered trademark. I think XFree86 must get
> > permition to use that and other font trademarks in its modified
> > fonts. That is problem for
t use registered trademarks, but use aliases instead.
In my opinion the free software comunity should stop using all
registered trademarks, such as helvetica, times, courier, lucida, etc.
Anton Zinoviev, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
don't have copyright
notice, so I would suppose that they are free GPL fonts. And then why
some of them was excluded as non-free from the package xfonts-scalable
(namely Adobe Utopia)?
Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
not do so.
Anton Zinoviev
14 matches
Mail list logo
