Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Felyza Wishbringer
Since this has sparked some interesting debate over the wording, for reference: WTFPLv1.0 (2000) http://repo.or.cz/w/wmaker-crm.git/blob/refs/heads/master:/COPYING.WTFPL WTFPLv1.1 (2010?) https://www.ohloh.net/licenses/wtfpl_1_1 http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/threadmill.git/plain/COPYING.WTFPL

Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011, Francesco Poli wrote: > > Added Sam, and I hope he doesn't mind, as I think he's the one which can > > give the best answer to this. > > That's OK with me. > > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:29:20 +0200 > > Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > > DO WHATEVER THE DUCK YOU

Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:41:15 +0200 Ricardo Mones wrote: > > Hi, Hi Ricardo! (Hi Sam!) > > Added Sam, and I hope he doesn't mind, as I think he's the one which can > give the best answer to this. That's OK with me. > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:29:20 +0200 > Francesco Poli wrote: > > >

Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Ricardo Mones
Hi, Added Sam, and I hope he doesn't mind, as I think he's the one which can give the best answer to this. On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:29:20 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > > DO WHATEVER THE DUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE > > Version 3, September 2011 > >

Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Simon Chopin
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:16:34PM -0400, Felyza Wishbringer wrote: > I am planning on submissions to a project that is looking to finish up > their Debian legality. I found a license that pretty much works, but I > don't like that it has no warranty disclaimer. So, I modified it per > the license

Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Simon Chopin
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:45:58PM +0200, Simon Chopin wrote: [...] > Actually, if you read Sam Hocevar's FAQ webpage about the WTFPL[1], this > issue is adressed by adding a separate disclaimer. It seems pretty hard > to miss. I must add that most of the time I see this licence used for > program

Re: License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:16:34 -0400 Felyza Wishbringer wrote: [...] > I found a license that pretty much works, but I > don't like that it has no warranty disclaimer. So, I modified it per > the license allowance, but I want an official 'yes its okay'. [...] > First, per the code of conduct, I am m

License check for a new(ly modified) license..

2011-09-26 Thread Felyza Wishbringer
I am planning on submissions to a project that is looking to finish up their Debian legality. I found a license that pretty much works, but I don't like that it has no warranty disclaimer. So, I modified it per the license allowance, but I want an official 'yes its okay'. It's very short. First,