On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:16:34PM -0400, Felyza Wishbringer wrote: > I am planning on submissions to a project that is looking to finish up > their Debian legality. I found a license that pretty much works, but I > don't like that it has no warranty disclaimer. So, I modified it per > the license allowance, but I want an official 'yes its okay'.
Hi, Actually, if you read Sam Hocevar's FAQ webpage about the WTFPL[1], this issue is adressed by adding a separate disclaimer. It seems pretty hard to miss. I must add that most of the time I see this licence used for program software, this disclaimer is added. I haven't checked Sam's work but it seems probable that it is also there. Therefore, I would suggest you to simply use the WTFPLv2 + disclaimer instead of contributing to licence proliferation. Cheers, Simon
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
