On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:57:21 -0600 Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hi, debian-legal
Hi!
>
> I'm basically done packaging the Ruby PDF::Writer [1] (as
> libpdf-writer-ruby; ITP #442087). While the module itself is under an
> MIT license, it includes quite a bit of different licenses in its
> material. Plea
John Halton dijo [Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 11:53:29PM +]:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:11:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Gunnar Wolf:
> >
> > > 2- This is the main reason I contact -legal: The short license
> > >regarding the Adobe PostScript AFM files does mention 'for any
> > >p
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:11:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Gunnar Wolf:
>
> > 2- This is the main reason I contact -legal: The short license
> >regarding the Adobe PostScript AFM files does mention 'for any
> >purpose and without charge'. How would you interpret this?
>
> Compare
* Gunnar Wolf:
> 2- This is the main reason I contact -legal: The short license
>regarding the Adobe PostScript AFM files does mention 'for any
>purpose and without charge'. How would you interpret this?
Compare the Adobe AFM license and the MIT license. 8-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 11:57:21AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> - Adobe PostScript AFM Files: may be used, copied, and distributed for
> any purpose and without charge, with or without modification,
> provided that all copyright notices are retained; that the AFM files
> are not distributed wi
Hi, debian-legal
I'm basically done packaging the Ruby PDF::Writer [1] (as
libpdf-writer-ruby; ITP #442087). While the module itself is under an
MIT license, it includes quite a bit of different licenses in its
material. Please refer to the debian/copyright file of my
work-in-progress packaging [2
6 matches
Mail list logo