On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:11:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Gunnar Wolf: > > > 2- This is the main reason I contact -legal: The short license > > regarding the Adobe PostScript AFM files does mention 'for any > > purpose and without charge'. How would you interpret this? > > Compare the Adobe AFM license and the MIT license. 8-)
Heh. Fair point. But the MIT licence is clearer: "Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy...". No risk of confusion there. The Adobe licence, by contrast, reads like one of the cautionary examples of ambiguous drafting that you get taught at law school. :-) John (TINLA) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
