Re: Debian-approved creative/content license?

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:48:52 +0200 Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2007-04-04 22:30:45, schrieb Francesco Poli: [...] > > I'm not sure I quite understand what you mean: are you referring to > > the game project you're currently contributing to? What's that 30 > > Mbyte quantity? Could you explain a

Re: Not-so-mass bug filing for the patented IDEA algorithm

[Cc'd to debian-legal in the hope of some informed comment.] On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 14:53 -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Er, by definition a patent is supposed to include a complete description of > > the invention that would permit a third-party t

Re: Debian-approved creative/content license?

Am 2007-04-04 22:30:45, schrieb Francesco Poli: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:01:02 +0200 Michelle Konzack wrote: > > [...] > > And currently I create some new weapons but the source of "sunburn" > > for example is around 70 MBytes including the sound effects plus a > > real Video of 480 MByte as source

Re: Swiftfox license

Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > I'm not sure if it's the MPL or Mozilla that didn't allow the > distribution of their images, or the patching of programs without > their knowledge but I think that is not DFSG-free. Last time I looked, the Mozilla images were in an other-licenses

Re: Hinner EDV: Correct Logo Usage?

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sorry, I fail to see how you can do this without losing your > credibility. The MIT license specifically gives one permission "to > deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation > the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish" etc. T