Re: Comments on the latest public CC draft

2007-02-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:51:32 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > I still have to read the final text (I am not so fast!): hence I don't > know whether there are differences with respect to the draft I > analyzed (but I've been told that there are). OK, I dumped the final text of CC-by-sa-v3.0/us

Re: What should be in debian/copyright when a gpl source now depends on openssl?

2007-02-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:33:08 -0500 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > That won't work as there is no SSL excpetion for the GPL. You can > check the copyright file for the httperf to see how I handled this > same issue. There are others, but that is the only one I can think of > off the top of my head.

Re: What should be in debian/copyright when a gpl source now depends on openssl?

2007-02-26 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:04:24PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am not sure the subject accurately reflects the body of this message. > > Narcis Ilisei has the copyright to inadyn. He released it under the gpl. > The source that he wrote is an http client of some sort Aand depends > onl

What should be in debian/copyright when a gpl source now depends on openssl?

2007-02-26 Thread shaulka
I am not sure the subject accurately reflects the body of this message. Narcis Ilisei has the copyright to inadyn. He released it under the gpl. The source that he wrote is an http client of some sort Aand depends only on libc. Now opendns.com offers to download a modified version. Their vers

Re: GFDL with no invariants/covers, is ok?

2007-02-26 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
> > suggested following terms (which btw were used in another package > > shipped in debian): > You could have googled a bit: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 doh... indeed... sorry about that -- was too late at night I guess ;-) Thanks everyone for the information! --

Re: Comments on the latest public CC draft

2007-02-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Francesco Poli: > Clause 4(a) states, in part: > > | If You create a Collective Work, upon notice from any Licensor > | You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Collective > | Work any credit as required by clause 4(c), as requested. If > | You create a Deriva

Re: GFDL with no invariants/covers, is ok?

2007-02-26 Thread MJ Ray
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document > | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or > | any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no > | Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover