Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document > | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or > | any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no > | Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. > `--- > > Does it sound ok?
FDL 1.1 has never been approved for debian AFAIK. Why aren't they using the current version? I'm slightly worried by that. I guess 'or any later version' lets you upgrade it in the package. FDL 1.2 with no covers or invariants has been special-cased by http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 but I don't understand why. > If not - what would be the best DFSG-free alternative license I should > suggest to release documentation under? I'd suggest the same licence as the rest of the software: that will make it easiest to move things between program and manuals. > P.S. Please CC me - I am not on the list. Done. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
