Re: Python Software Foundation trademark policy

Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you really not work out what I meant? No. I had no idea how you think the trademark is being infringed in your example. > The CD I have been sold by the Debian distributor uses the Python > trademarks to label their shipped version of the Pyt

Re: Python Software Foundation trademark policy

MJ Ray wrote: If I purchase Debian CDs and type "python", or I do "man python" and read all about the interpreter which I can invoke by typing "python" which interprets the Python programming language, or I install "python-doc" and read some more, isn't that use of the trademark? What trade i

Re: Geogratis licence review

Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:58:34 + Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > [please CC me on replies as I am not on the debian-legal list] > > Done! >[..] 4. The Licensee shall license all persons or parties who >obtain Data or Derivative Products from the

Re: Bug#385990: (forw) Bug#385990: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#385990: ttf-malayalam-fonts: Add another font to the package

Soumyadip Modak said on Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:08:41AM +0530,: > As far as I remember, I received a mail from the original > developers of RacOtf who claim it is GPL-ed. I'll hunt up the mail > and forward it. I plan to include it in the next big upgrade of > ttf-indic-fonts (I

Re: Bug#385990: (forw) Bug#385990: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#385990: ttf-malayalam-fonts: Add another font to the package

Hi, 2006/12/18, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: (trying to solve an issue in Debian with fonts for the Malayalam language, one of the official languages in India. This language uses its own script. Debian Installer is now translated in Malayalam but we have problems to display Malayalam

Re: GFDL v2 draft 1 analysis [long]

Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for showing my point. I'm glad that I showed the point of Marco d'Itri: that he will post much nonsense, from misattributed quotes, to accusations that people joining debian-legal in 2003 introduced interpretations of the DFSG which had apparentl

Re: Open Font License 1.1review2 - comments?

Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >In summary, can we conclude that works solely released under the terms > >of SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE Version 1.1-review2, are DFSG-free, *if* their > >Reserved Font Names are only names used in previous versions of the > >work? > Y