Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:58:34 +0000 Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > [please CC me on replies as I am not on the debian-legal list] > > Done! >[..] 4. The Licensee shall license all persons or parties who > obtain Data or Derivative Products from the Licensee the > right to use the Data or Derivative Products by way of a > license agreement, and that agreement shall impose upon > these persons or parties the same terms and conditions > as those contained in section 4.0 of this Agreement. > 5. 4.4 The Licensee's liability to indemnify Canada under
I didn't spot any obvious DFSG-busters. The above 4. looks like a partial copyleft. That and the ad-clause 3.0 may make it GPL- incompatible in some situations, but not the mere aggregation that I think is happening for mapnik. As 5. 4.4 demonstrates, the numbering is generally strange. It might be worth questioning those and making them aware of the DFSG as a part of that, but it seems OK without it. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
