On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:17:48 +0100 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
[...]
> Now I wonder: I've got some texts which I wrote in Microsoft Word and
> then converted to PDF. While I can create a more-or-less useful HTML
> version, I prefer to work on them in the proprietary Word format.
>
> Suppose Debian wo
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Terry Hancock wrote:
> I think you have to recognize some kind of pragmatic limit to these
> kinds of restrictions. The HTML certainly can be modified, and a lot
> more people know HTML than some ad hoc XML format. It may well be the
> case that the HTML would be the preferred
Terry Hancock wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I don't think so. Machine-generated HTML is not source, at least not
> > until it becomes the form that is actually preferred for making
> > modifications to the work...
>
> I think you have to recognize some kind of pragmatic limit to these
> kinds
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:12:05 -0600 Terry Hancock wrote:
>> Yes, it seems the question here is *whose* "preferred form for
>> modifications"?
>>
>> The GPL appears to assume there is a general consensus on this, and
>> there may not be.
>
> IMO, whenever there's any doubt abo
On Friday 03 November 2006 14:06, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Nov 2006, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> NB: Licence is also an appropriate spelling.
Informative, thank you. I had presumed there was a copy & paste error.
> > Avoiding the click wrap means you have not accepted ALL the terms of
> > the
On 11/04/06 06:47, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 01:27:43 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 03 Nov 2006, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> [...]
>>> 1) Does this license allow me to treat the package as licensed under
>>> the plain GPL in terms of what I am allowed to do?
> [...]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don Armstrong
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006, Sean Kellogg wrote:
On Friday 03 November 2006 01:24, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Setting up wrapper terms and/or clickwraps that cannot be removed
> contravenes §6:
--
IF YOU DO NOT ACC
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:12:05 -0600 Terry Hancock wrote:
> Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> > That's what I would think. But consider this example. I write texts
> > in a homebrewed XML format, which makes little sense for anyone but
> > me. Obviously I prefer to use that format. I have an XSLT
> > trans
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 01:27:43 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Nov 2006, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
[...]
> > 1) Does this license allow me to treat the package as licensed under
> > the plain GPL in terms of what I am allowed to do?
[...]
> As to whether we can do #1, that's something
> t
9 matches
Mail list logo
