On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Terry Hancock wrote: > I think you have to recognize some kind of pragmatic limit to these > kinds of restrictions. The HTML certainly can be modified, and a lot > more people know HTML than some ad hoc XML format. It may well be the > case that the HTML would be the preferred form for modification for > anyone but the original author.
If you ship both XML + HTML, and someone decides to make a derived work based upon the HTML, at least for that person and the distribution of her derived work, it's the source. But yes, the actual usage of a particular format feel like a good indication, like the proof of the pudding ... cheers Per Eric Rosén (IANDD etc ...) -- ^): Per Eric Rosén http://rosnix.net/~per/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG 7A7A BD68 ADC0 01E1 F560 79FD 33D1 1EC3 1EBB 7311
