Re: PHP license style [was: Re: licenses with name changing clauses]

2006-05-27 Thread MJ Ray
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > > Wow, that's arrogant, not only reserving the package's filename > > (arguably acceptable to ensure integrity) but the names of many > > possible derivatives/competitors. > > Does this mean that you agree with

Re: license of cstex / cslatex

2006-05-27 Thread Joe Smith
"Francesco Poli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Because on the one hand the copyright holder says that no further restrictions (beyond the ones found in the GPL terms) can be imposed on recipients (see GPLv2, section 6). On the other hand he himself adds one such re