Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > > Wow, that's arrogant, not only reserving the package's filename > > (arguably acceptable to ensure integrity) but the names of many > > possible derivatives/competitors. > > Does this mean that you agree with me that the super-name-change clause > of PHP License version 3.01 fails to comply with the DFSG?
Please don't cut my messages unmarked. The cut part should have made it clear that I view these restrictions as more comedy than problems. Also, this one was about filenames, not package names. Finally, please don't send personal messages to me to mailing lists. Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
