On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:32:36 + Henning Makholm wrote:
> However, lsmod tells me that something called
> "nvidia_agp" is loaded; is that the one?
I don't think so.
My guess is that this module is:
CONFIG_AGP_NVIDIA
This option gives you AGP support for the GLX component of the
XFree86 4.
David Moreno Garza wrote:
I think Joey's mail is quite good since it is just stating facts. Truth
cannot be made up, specially on free software (and non-free also) legal
issues.
It took me a long time to learn this one, but it's true - it's not just
what you say, it's the way that you say it. I ha
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:42:04PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050308 18:12]:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:31:08PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050308 17:18]:
> > > > Many DDs only want to package their package in
Scripsit Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:17:56AM -0800, Ben Johnson wrote:
>> After a quick search to try and find if the FSF ever
>> voiced an opinion on nv, I unfortunately only dug out
>> the well-known case against NVidia's binary kernel
>> module.
> Will any of t
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:17:56AM -0800, Ben Johnson wrote:
> After a quick search to try and find if the FSF ever
> voiced an opinion on nv, I unfortunately only dug out
> the well-known case against NVidia's binary kernel
> module.
Will any of the X nVidia support work without that binary kerne
5 matches
Mail list logo
