Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> "You may not have any cookies right now".
>
> It's a reflexive negation rewording of "May I " -> "You may not ".
[snip]
Well, that's fine, but if I don't need your permission in order
to have cookies, it's sort of irrelevant. Also, it doesn't
actuall
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:31:03AM +0100, Eike Dehling wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Eike Dehling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: spin
> Version : 4.2.4
> Upstream Author : Bell-Labs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.spinroot.com
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:42:29AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Lewis Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
>
> I think the obvious intended meaning is another assertion of
> representation norms. The other conditions of this licence use
> "must" not "may". To what wording convention do you refer?
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:21:30 + Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> * Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-21 22:33]:
> > Any plans for the trademark side of the issue?
>
> I asked Matthew Garrett to work on an appropriate license. He sent a
> mail to spi-trademark in Aug
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-21 22:33]:
> Any plans for the trademark side of the issue?
I asked Matthew Garrett to work on an appropriate license. He sent a
mail to spi-trademark in August (and a follow-up in September) but it
never went anywhere. I'll ask him to send another r
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:31:54 -0600 Billy Biggs wrote:
> > This seems to be not only non-free, but even undistributable! :-(
>
> The code that this comment refers to was not being used and has been
> removed from newer versions of tvtime. Since the code is long gone, I
> have removed the comme
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:56:55 + Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> There has been some progress. Gregory Pomerantz, SPI's legal council,
> has written a copyright assignment agreement and the arist of the logo
> has agreed to sign it and thereby hand ownership over to SPI. Once
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:12:37 + Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Formally stated, it's approximately "trademarks cannot make a work
> strictly non-free, but you may have to replace all instances of the
> trademark with something else". Depending on circumstances, this may
> be an implicit change-the-na
MJ Ray wrote:
> As a first attempt to fix, if it's thought to be a problem, can
> you ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] to give blanket permission for php packaging
> to be called "PHP" or "PHP for distribution-or-package-system"?
Tried that, received:
996 N ! Feb 21 PHP Automoderator 117 PHP posting confi
MJ Ray wrote:
> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, is permitted provided that the following conditions
> are met:
> [...]
> 4. Products derived from this software may not be called "PHP", nor
> may "PHP" appear in their name, without prior wr
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-20 18:17]:
> I'm wondering whether there has been any progress on the Debian Open
> Use Logo issue...
There has been some progress. Gregory Pomerantz, SPI's legal council,
has written a copyright assignment agreement and the arist of the logo
has agre
Lewis Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> Having just reread your post again, I think I realise what you are
> saying. Because they wrote the 'condition' as "Products derived from
> this software may not be called "PHP", nor may "PHP" appear in their
> name, without prior written permiss
12 matches
Mail list logo
