Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't seem to be getting mail from the BTS on this bug. Anyway, it
> seemed to me that the Creative Commons licenses would be more
> appropriate since they were specifically designed to cover media:
>
> This one is just a MIT-ish license:
> http://cr
Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:41:27AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
>> I would suggest you use the GPL, and add a note somewhere that you
>> interpret the GPL as above. If anyone disagrees with your
>> interpretation (and so far nobody has), then the issue can b
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 11:43:10AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Ryan> Anyway, it seemed to me that the Creative Commons licenses
> Ryan> would be more appropriate since they were specifically
> Ryan> designed to cover media:
>
> Ryan> This one is just a MIT-ish license:
> Ryan> h
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> The bigger issue, though, is that I didn't provide a DFSG section for
>> the first problem. The closest the DFSG comes to prohibiting use
>> restrictions is #6 ("No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeav
> "Ryan" == Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ryan> I don't seem to be getting mail from the BTS on this bug.
You weren't listed in your mail-followup-to header, but I CCed you
anyway. Hmmm, I guess I should have CCed you at the start, sorry about
that (the BTS doesn't automatica
Lewis Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The discussion of The Affero License in the debian-legal archives may
> be relevant.
The Affero license (or clause in a possible GPL 3, or whatever) actually
does restrict modification, because it says that you can't remove
quine-like code from the work
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:41:27AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> I would suggest you use the GPL, and add a note somewhere that you
> interpret the GPL as above. If anyone disagrees with your
> interpretation (and so far nobody has), then the issue can be resolved
> at that time.
>
> To do this, you
Scripsit Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The bigger issue, though, is that I didn't provide a DFSG section for
> the first problem. The closest the DFSG comes to prohibiting use
> restrictions is #6 ("No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor"), but
> I'm uncomfortable using that for this
Agreed on all counts, Brian.
I actually think Squeak should go into non-free on Debian, once the
fonts are removed from the image. I've been meaning to develop a
message to debian-legal about this for quite a while, and now Roland's
post and Alan Kay's Turing award seem to be creating a good tim
Andreas Barth wrote:
"deploying software without providing source" is a field of endeavour,
and we can't discriminate against it, or else no Debian user can produce
proprietary software.
Of course we can discriminate - like the GPL does.
The GPL discriminates against distribution without
@ 22/04/2004 18:26 : wrote Andreas Barth :
Of course we can discriminate - like the GPL does.
Cheers,
Andi
no, no, the GPL discriminates what you do with the specific piece of
software you are redistributing or its derived works, not if you are or
not distributing other software, that is n
Thinking more about this issue, I've come up with an example that I
thin illustrates how we have accepted similar sloppiness in the past.
I suspect we would accept and have accepted a copyright at the top of
a file that said roughly:
Copyright 2003 by the Evil Empire, Inc.
This software can be re
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Humberto Massa wrote:
> >- Item #5 "External Deployment" places distribution-like burdens on
> > deployment. E.g., when the Work is made available over a network
> > source must be distributed. This amounts to forced distribution (DFSG
> > ??).
> This fails the desert isla
* Humberto Massa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040422 22:25]:
> @ 22/04/2004 16:31 : wrote Jeremy Hankins :
> >Here's the draft summary of the OSL2.0 I promised. Comments
> >requested. Specifically:
> >
> >Regarding the patent clause: Sam Hartman, you & Anders Torger (the
> >upstream licensor) were the on
@ 22/04/2004 16:31 : wrote Jeremy Hankins :
Here's the draft summary of the OSL2.0 I promised. Comments
requested. Specifically:
Regarding the patent clause: Sam Hartman, you & Anders Torger (the
upstream licensor) were the only two I saw while going back over the
thread that felt it wasn't a
Here's the draft summary of the OSL2.0 I promised. Comments
requested. Specifically:
Regarding the patent clause: Sam Hartman, you & Anders Torger (the
upstream licensor) were the only two I saw while going back over the
thread that felt it wasn't a problem. Is my characterization of that
issue
The font issues seem serious, and it is likely that Debian would have
to ship Squeak without the non-free Apple fonts.
> (4) The distributed files squeak.changes and squeak.image, both around
> 10MB, are shipped in binary form. I wonder if there should be source
> code to create them initially. (S
Bonjour,
Ceci est un accusé de réception PMEBTP vous certifiant que votre réponse a bien
été envoyée à l'entreprise ayant déposé l'annonce.
Pour tout renseignement concernant notre service, je suis votre interlocutrice
sur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Si vous ne l'avez pas déjà fait, je vous invite à dép
[Sorry, resending previously unfinished report.]
Hi,
today I read that Alan Kay will receive this years's Turing Award[1] and
checked out his "Open Source" project Squeak[2]. I also realized that
there is an open RFP for it[3]. The package is supposed to be free, but
when I checked the license[4]
Hi,
today I read that Alan Kay will receive this years's Turing Award[1] and
checked out his "Open Source" project Squeak[2]. I also realized that
there is an open RFP for it[3]. The package is supposed to be free, but
when I checked the license[4] and the package files, I encountered the
followin
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:55:30PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
>> Jake Appelbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > LICENCE FOR HYDRA (all version)
>> > by van Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> >
Joshua Tacoma said on Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:58:34AM -0400,:
> I am looking at packaging the Swiss Ephemeris:
You are not the only one. Jaldhar H. Vyas tried before.
> : You must ensure that all recipients of machine-executable forms
> of these items are also able to receive and us
(not only am INAL, I also have no experience developing debian packages,
and this may grow into my first one)
I am looking at packaging the Swiss Ephemeris:
http://www.astro.com/swisseph/?lang=e
It's available under two licenses: one (free) for "Open Source" use, the
other ($) for "commercia
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:26:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:42:38PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > [CCing you because of the address in the To: field; apologies if you didn't
> > want the CC]
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:54:16PM +0200, Jiba wrote:
> > > A
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:55:30PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Jake Appelbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > LICENCE FOR HYDRA (all version)
> > by van Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > 1. This software comes with no warrenty or promise
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:42:38PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> [CCing you because of the address in the To: field; apologies if you didn't
> want the CC]
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:54:16PM +0200, Jiba wrote:
> > About a character 3D model, I am wondering if such a statement can occur
> > in
26 matches
Mail list logo
